Same place, two strikingly different compositions of this narrow lane, and you find yourself captivated by entirely new aspects. Do you feel the same? The other image irresistibly draws your gaze towards the windows and shutters, despite offering a wealth of intricate details beyond its landscape counterpart. The interplay of light and shadow weaves a dynamic tapestry that elevates the textures of the buildings. Each detail enlightened, allowing us to revel in the artistry of the architecture. Above all, I love the contrast and the play of light here—the very essence of monochrome and black and white photography. It accentuates shapes and forms, urging us to dive deeper into the image, as the absence of color beautifully challenges us to discover elegance in both simplicity and complexity.
Taken in Villefranche sur Mer
Ritva Sillanmäki Photography 
Both are excellent and work so well in monochrome. But I prefer the portrait one best, I think the subject works better and there is more to look at. The flat boring wall on the landscape detracts somewhat. Great photos though 🙂
Seeing the difference is amazing. What the eyes can do being tricked be a focal point
This lane is an excellent subject for monochrome Ritva, and you photographed it so well. I do prefer the landscape version because it seems to draw me in more. And I like the lighting better. Both are great versions.
Totally agree.
Amazing how light, shadow, and perspective can turn the same spot into two completely different stories.🖤
I feel more a part of it in the portrait version, Ritva. It really draws me in xx
The portrait version gives me a more inclusive sense of the surroundings.
Lanes are such great subjects for photos and in monochrome even better. While the same lane each photo shows you something different. Great images Ritva.
I don’t know a whole lot about photography but love these photos 😍
Thank you Tyler, that is great to hear,